[ad_1]
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s personal health care routine was bewildering with its inconsistencies. He condemned seed oil. This is despite the scientific consensus that the oils are harmless. Drinking raw milk has been proven to make people sick. and uses testosterone as part of his anti-aging routine. While insisting that he does not use anabolic steroids.
Some of his routines, such as drinking raw milk for its health benefits, are It is based on two layers of science. But his anti-aging approach seems to be working in his favour. Although the most obvious effect appears to be that of juicing. While many men in their 70s focus on preventing hip fractures, But Kennedy’s use of testosterone which, despite his objections to the contrary, is actually a steroid. This means he can do pull-ups with ease.
What is RFK Jr.? What he does with his body is nobody’s business. But his health routine provides insight into how he views health care regulation and self-experimentation. If he is confirmed as Secretary of Health and Human Services, RFK Jr. would be America’s head of self-experimentation. And taking testosterone was his most visible experiment.
Testosterone is best known for its role in puberty and promoting male characteristics such as muscle mass and facial hair. But it will affect other bodily functions. Countless more Men who don’t have enough testosterone to drive these processes may be diagnosed with hypogonadism, or low T. Some people have testicles that don’t function properly in producing testosterone. Aaron While some people experience a decrease in hormones due to age. Regardless of the underlying cause, a deficit causes the body to function less efficiently.
But this condition can be treated with a relatively simple testosterone injection or gel. And research shows that this effect can improve some symptoms of hypogonadism. One large clinical trial found that hypogonadal men who received testosterone saw “Slight but significant improvements in mood and energy” compared to placebo Researchers also found that elderly men with low T and mobility problems experienced improved walking ability after supplementation. And testosterone increases bone density.
Although doctors seem to agree on treating men who have real problems with their testicles, But the question of whether to treat men who have seen their testosterone decline with age remains unanswered. It has divided the medical world. There is no apparent reason that older men with sagging testosterone levels would not respond as positively to testosterone as men with testicular problems. But critics argue that it is for older men. The benefits are generally small and may come with disadvantages. Take, for example, Steven Nissen, a cardiologist who is involved in testosterone research. published an article showing that testosterone supplementation was associated with an increase in bone fractures. He told me hormones “It should not be used as a fountain of youth.” The FDA also states that testosterone should not be prescribed to older men suffering from natural decline because “its benefits and safety have not been established.” of this use”
Kennedy’s use of hormones was what he called a “hormone attack”. “Anti-aging approaches” are considered experimental. Considering the FDA’s standpoint, he’s far from the only man in the trial. Anti-aging clinics ready to prescribe testosterone to men they deem eligible are proliferating online. Blokes warns on its website that “Men naturally decrease their testosterone levels due to aging.” Another site, TRT Nation, promises “affordable medicine for low testosterone and anti-aging. from a distance And delivered right to your door!”
Every doctor I spoke with stressed that only men with low testosterone levels should take the drug. Long-term side effects of what is called “Over-supplementation” is largely unknown. And some evidence suggests that the benefits are limited when men are already in the normal testosterone range. Landon Trost, who helped write the Testosterone Treatment Guidelines for The American Urological Association says. Many doctors are also understandably wary of prescribing drugs to people who are not actually sick. This is because for decades athletes and healthy men have been abusing drugs looking to improve their physique. Advertising from telehealth companies Along with data showing that many men receiving testosterone do not even have their levels tested beforehand. giving credence to their fears “It’s very Wild West right now, buyer beware,” Trost said.
If Kennedy is confirmed to lead HHS, his interest in testosterone could drive the conversation about the hormone more firmly. For example, he could support the National Institutes of Health. which he is taking care of Fund additional trials on the potential use of hormones in older men. Work with the Surgeon General to create a public service campaign encouraging older men to get their testosterone levels tested. and warning young people about the risks of drug misuse. Encourage drug manufacturers to conduct more clinical trials. and have even supported removing the drug from the list of controlled substances, which has been in place since the 1990s, when Congress rushed to add it in response to a doping scandal and objections from the American Medical Association. and where it is now classified, it is just as dangerous as ketamine.
Some of these actions may be praised even by doctors who take a conservative approach to testosterone therapy. But the prospective health secretary has not yet shown any interest in introducing testosterone into modern medicine.
Kennedy appears to be interested in certain health products because they do not have a stamp of approval from regulators. He didn’t speak directly about FDA regulation of testosterone, but he said he wanted to end it. FDA’s “war on public health” by deregulating “Psychedelic drugs, peptides, stem cells, raw milk, barometric therapy, chelating compounds, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamins… (and) nutraceuticals.”
The amount of evidence supporting these different treatments and their associated risks varies greatly. What ties all of this together is the FDA’s insistence that people shouldn’t try it on themselves. And if Kennedy succeeds in ending what he calls the “aggressive suppression” of his favorite compound Some Americans may die (using chelating compounds or stem cells, for example, can be dangerous), others will put their money and hope behind treatments that may be marketed as healthy but are ineffective. More than just unnecessary sugar pills, the FDA was founded more than a century ago with the goal of helping Americans avoid these types of problems. By calling for stricter regulation of these compounds, RFK Jr. is sending the message that patients should no longer rely on the FDA’s judgment of safety. Instead, the logic follows. They should test themselves. like him
Kennedy may have reason to look up to regulators’ historically conservative approach to health products: His anti-aging approach appears to be working so well that he looks old or insulting to people in their 70s. more years than nearly three decades ago. If you are in the best shape of your life with the help of testosterone as recommended by regulatory agencies. You might be wondering these things as well.
Best case scenario If the country follows RFK Jr.’s lead, it’s that self-experiments will push the science behind these treatments in some form. But each person who abandons medical treatment for self-experimentation It is one less data point that helps our society decide which treatments are effective. And where do we still need more research? The lack of such information makes everyone Except for those willing to risk their own health, whether based on their own hunches or those of health influencers. Worse, if Kennedy truly believed these products could make America healthy again. He should translate his experience in self-experimentation into prudent regulatory policy. Testosterone might be his first target. With little faith in the regulatory system He intends to throw away a lot of trash. He can help many people who rely on government to answer these questions. and finally He might be able to convince them more that some of his favorite experiments were subject to scrutiny.
[ad_2]
Source link
