[ad_1]
Produced by ElevenLabs and News through sound (Noah) Using AI-powered narration, listen to more stories on the Noa app.
Hunter Biden has had a difficult life. and faces many years in prison Until Sunday when his father saved his life. By issuing a book Full executive pardon He cleared him of all charges. Show me the parents who don’t do the same. If saving Hunter’s life was politically inappropriate or a reputational risk? It also follows the higher and more severe law of family love.
Politicians, like all officials, aim to deal objectively with family-related conflicts of interest. What the president did fell short of that standard. But not for malicious reasons. The right’s mockery of liberals fawning over the president’s parenting is complicated by the fact that Biden appears to be a truly empathetic father. Forgiving Hunter was the only thing he could do. And it was something he might especially feel inclined to do now that Hunter was his only living son. Parents affected by the loss of a child can be forgiven for fighting fiercely for the well-being of their remaining children. And any parent would likely sympathize with the feelings of regret and remorse that may accompany failure to do this.
Since Hunter’s legal troubles began Biden promises he will not interfere with justice. Just this summer, Mr. President specified It’s clear he will. “Joe Biden’s personality as a public servant is what has driven him to make it clear that the law applies to everyone,” said Jen Psaki, former White House press secretary said on MSNBC this June.It added that the justice system that convicted Hunter was “The same system that… (President Biden) pledged to protect.” The president has seemed like a principled figure on this issue for some time, but in statement Issued when a pardon was granted to Hunter. He disputed his decision. used to be Fair and principled: “No reasonable person considering the facts of Hunter’s case could reach any other conclusion. Except for Hunter who was separated just because he was my son. And that is wrong… I believe in the justice system But while I have fought against this I also believe that raw politics has interfered with this process. And it leads to a miscarriage of justice.”
Understandably, both the president’s supporters and opponents were angered by the pardon. Especially considering his past assurances that he would not intervene in Hunter’s case. “Chairman Joe BidenHunter’s Pardon His son deepens the political and rule of law mess. This tarnishes America’s faith in justice. And it will almost certainly get worse. Donald TrumpThe second phase,” said one analyst. write To CNN, it echoed widespread complaints that the president’s decision only supports Trump’s argument that his own criminal case was political rather than an unjust execution. Even some critics are more sympathetic to the president. Condemning the move as naked hypocrisy, my colleague Jonathan Chait wrote in atlantic ocean That “When the law stuck with (Hunter), he opened the door and walked through. It’s a door that the average American doesn’t have access to.” try To distinguish between Trump’s prosecution and Hunter’s prosecution—former Attorney General Eric Holder disputeFor example, because no reasonable prosecutor would bring these charges against Hunter. The pardon is therefore appropriate, Trump himself. called pardoning “violations and miscarriages of justice!” and threatening to prepare The same pardon was given to the rioters who attacked the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Biden may be correct that Hunter’s impeachment is political to some degree. This is despite arguments protecting the impartiality of the justice system. But criminal prosecution across the board is often precipitated by factor Apart from the simple facts of the case Prosecutors have broad discretion. Who is in the courtroom? and who was released or transferred? And the identity of the accused could easily affect their decision, for example. past Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson say 1940 “If prosecutors need to choose their own cases You can choose the defendant… With law books filled with many different types of crimes. Prosecutors therefore have a fair chance of detecting at least a technical violation. of some kind of action from almost everyone.”
However, Biden has repeatedly broken his promises regarding Hunter’s case. And pardons are likely to damage any remaining faith in the judicial system. The president is undoubtedly aware of these facts. But that is the president’s concern. and at the end of the term of office Biden is showing that he stays motivated by his responsibilities as a father. The anger over Hunter’s pardon is reminiscent of efforts to undermine Biden’s 2020 campaign by releasing data taken from the younger Biden’s laptop. Including emotional and revealing messages. exchange between father and son “Good morning, my beautiful son. I miss you and love you, Dad,” Biden wrote in February 2019, when Hunter was still recovering from a long-term drug addiction. Hunter responded with a long rant about a number of personal issues. It was ultimately concluded that he was “a mess.” addicted to drugs That cannot be trusted.” His father consoled him, saying, “I will run, but I need you,” he said of his campaign plans. For Hunter, he said, “The only focus is recovery. Nothing else.”
What parent can say anything less? And who, faced with the opportunity to save their child from unjust criminal charges and possible prison sentences, wouldn’t take it? In the eyes of the president His only surviving son is a victim of an unfair and politically motivated perversion of the judicial system based on his parentage. This is the kind of situation that most mothers or fathers despise: Their child is hurt not because of who they are, but because of who. you Said. “There is an attempt to destroy the Hunter. who has been sober for five and a half years Even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution,” the president said in his official statement. His decision appears to be aimed at freeing Hunter and protecting his recovery and sobriety. which is the duty of true love
Parental love has an almost animalistic element. It can destroy principles. Breaking ethical standards or even destroy morality I am reminded of what EM Forster wrote in his 1938 essay, “What I believe“: “If I had to choose between betraying my country and betraying my friends. I hope I have the courage to betray my country.” There are things I can imagine doing for my children that I could never dream of. And I believe that is the truth of parental love. Even if you think the president has wronged the United States. He did the right thing by his son. And it is not immediately clear which obligations deserve higher priority. What? is Obviously, once we remove all political and social concerns, All the promises we make to others and ourselves under normal conditions. All expectations and manners are reduced to only love.
[ad_2]
Source link
