[ad_1]
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts issued a warning on Tuesday that the United States must preserve “judicial independence” just weeks before President Donald Trump’s inauguration.
Roberts explains his concerns in his annual report on the federal judiciary.
“Making everyone happy is not the nature of judicial work. Most cases have winners and losers. Every branch of the executive branch faces setbacks in the court system. Sometimes in cases there are major ramifications for executive or legislative power. or other consequential topics,” Roberts wrote in the 15-page report. “However, Over the past several decades The court’s decision has been upheld. Whether it’s popular or not and the nation avoided the conflicts that occurred in the 1950s and 1960s.”
“however In the past few years Elected officials from all political branches have committed open disregard for federal court decisions,” Roberts said, without naming Trump. President Biden or any specific lawmaker “These dangerous suggestions Whether it happens periodically It must be rejected outright. The independence of the judiciary is worth preserving. As my late colleague Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote. That independent judiciary ‘Essential to the rule of law in any country’ but ‘risky’ Mayhem can collapse if existing social laws do not take care to maintain its security.”
“I call on all Americans to honor this legacy from our founding generation. And I admire his patience,” Roberts said.
Democrats launch ‘Calculated attempt’ to undermine SCOTUS since DOBBS, CBS reporter says
Roberts also quoted Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, who noted that all three branches of government It “must work in successful cooperation” to “enable the effective functioning of government agencies designed to protect the interests of freedom with judicial impartiality and independence.”
John Roberts, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor stood on the House floor. Ahead of President Biden’s annual address Before the joint meeting on March 7, 2024 (Shawn Thew-Pool/Getty Images)
“Our political system and economic strength depend on the rule of law,” Roberts wrote.
Important Supreme Court immunity decision authored by Roberts Along with another Supreme Court decision that halted efforts to disqualify Trump from voting. It is being promoted as a key victory on the Republican nominee’s path to winning the election. The decision to protect those rights was criticized by Democrats such as Biden, who later called for term limits and an enforceable code of conduct. This was after criticism over the undisclosed travel and gifts from wealthy benefactors to some judges.
A number of Democrats and one Republican lawmaker called on Biden to ignore the decision by a Trump-appointed judge to revoke FDA approval of the drug. Fepristone for abortion last year Biden has refused to take executive action to avoid the verdict. And later, the Supreme Court allowed the White House to stay. By allowing them to continue selling drugs.
The Supreme Court meets in Washington, D.C. on February 2, 2024. (MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)
Last year, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority also ruled that Biden’s massive student loan forgiveness effort amounted to an illegal use of executive power.
Biggest Supreme Court decisions of 2024: From presidential immunity to overturning the Chevron doctrine
Roberts and Trump clashed in 2018 when the chief justice slammed the president for denouncing judges who rejected his immigrant asylum policy as “a misdemeanor”. “Obama’s Judge”
In 2020, Roberts criticized comments by Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is considering a high-profile abortion case.
Roberts introduced his letter on Tuesday by telling the story of King George III’s dismissal of life-appointed colonial judges. which is an order ‘Not well received’ Trump is now preparing for a second term as president with an ambitious conservative agenda. Various elements It is likely to be legally challenged and end up in court. The conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump during his first term.
in the annual report The Chief Justice basically wrote that Even if the court’s decision is unpopular or considered a setback for the presidential administration, But other agencies The government must be willing to enforce to guarantee the rule of law. Robert points to Brown V. The Board of Education’s decision to desegregate the schools in 1954 required federal enforcement in the face of opposition from southern governors.
Chief Justice John Roberts (left) and Associate Justice Samuel Alito sit as they and other Supreme Court members Sitting for a group photo at the Supreme Court building on capitol hill On Friday, Oct. 10, September 7, 2022 in Washington, D.C. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
He also said that “An attempt to intimidate judges into their decisions in cases. that is inappropriate and should be vigorously opposed.”
Although government officials and others Have the right to criticize the decision. But they should also be aware that their statements can “It can provoke dangerous reactions in others,” Roberts wrote.
According to U.S. Marshals Service statistics, threats targeting federal judges have more than tripled over the past decade. State court judges in Wisconsin and Maryland were killed at their homes in 2022 and 2023, Roberts wrote.
“Violence, intimidation, and defiance are aimed at judges because their work undermines our republic. And it is completely unacceptable,” he wrote.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Roberts also pointed out that disinformation about court decisions is a threat to judges’ independence. It said social media can amplify distortion. and even cheap “Hostile foreign state actors” exploit it to deepen divisions.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source link
