[ad_1]
First time with Fox: President-elect Donald Trump is suing the Des Moines Registry and top pollster J. Ann Selzer for “shameless election interference” and electoral fraud. The last president in 2024 showed Vice President Kamala. Harris leads him in Iowa. Even though he won the highest percentage in the presidential election, indicated by more than 13 percentage points, Fox News Digital has learned.
The lawsuit was filed Monday night in Polk County, Iowa, under the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act. and related provisions stating that the company tried “Taking responsibility for the shameless election interference perpetrated by the Des Moines Register (DMR) and Selzer” in support of former defeated Democratic candidate Kamala Harris through the use of the Des Moines Register/Mediacom. Iowa Poll that was leaked and manipulated It was processed by Selzer and S&C and published by DMR and Gannett in the Des Moines Register on November 2, 2024.”
FOX FIRST: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS and ABC apologize to TRUMP, forced to pay $15 million to settle defamation lawsuit
“The opposite is true and challenges credulity. The defendant’s Harris Poll was released three days before Election Day and was intended to show Harris leading President Trump in Iowa by three points. President Trump ultimately won Iowa by more than thirteen points,” the lawsuit states.
Selzer released her final poll sponsored by the Des Moines Register of Iowa just three days before the election, on November 1, No. 2, showing Vice President Kamala Harris leading Trump. By 3 points, the shocking poll shows a 7-point shift from Trump to Harris since September. When he had a 4-point lead over the vice president in the same poll.

Pollster J. Ann Selzer has announced she will end her voting career. After President Donald Trump’s victory (Getty Images/ The Bulwark Podcast via YouTube screenshot)
But in the end Trump also beat Harris in Iowa by more than 13 percentage points.
However, Selzer’s polls were exaggerated by the media before the election. This is because her election predictions in previous elections have been historically accurate.
Trump’s lawyer says Selzer’s prediction about Harris’ three-point lead in “Crimson Iowa is unreal. But it is a fiction that interferes in the election.”
Trump’s lawyer said Selzer takes “pride of his mainstream reputation for accuracy. despite several serious election misses in favor of Democrats,” and said she “It would lead the public to believe that it was just a coincidence that one of the worst polls missed her. The career took place just days before the most consequential election in memory. It was leaked and happened to clash with Republican candidates.”
SHOCK POLL has Harris leading Trump in Iowa by a 3-point shift over the VP in the red state.
“The Harris Poll was not a ‘mistake,’ but rather an attempt to influence the outcome of the 2024 presidential election,” the lawsuit states. Adding that “The defendants and their allies in the Democratic Party hope that the Harris Poll will create a false narrative about Harris is inevitable in the final weeks of the 2024 presidential election.”
“On the other hand, The November 5 election turned out to be a huge victory for President Trump in both the Electoral College and the popular vote. It is an overwhelming statement of his America First principles and consignment of the radical socialist agenda to the dustbin of history.”
The lawsuit notes that Selzer, after more than 35 years in the industry, “retired in election disgrace less than two weeks after this shameful journey.”
Trump’s lawyer argued that “Left-wing pollsters attempted to influence election results through manipulated elections with unacceptable margins of error. and is not based on any widely accepted method of voting.”
FORMER POLLSTER ANN SELZER Bounces Back on Criticism Over IOWA POLL: ‘They’re Accusing Me of a Crime’
“While Selzer was not the only pollster to engage in this corrupt conduct, She also has a large platform and following, thus providing a significant and impactful opportunity for voter fraud,” the lawsuit states. “As Seltzer knows. This type of manipulation creates an unavoidable narrative for Democratic candidates. Increased enthusiasm among Democrats It forced Republicans to shift campaign time and money to areas where they were ahead. and deceived the public into believing that Democratic candidates were running. Better than it really is.”
The case stated that “The Democrats’ need for a phony election is even more acute than usual in the 2024 election, given Harris’s many serious weaknesses as a candidate. and lacks appeal to the critical tendencies of the traditional Democratic base.”

Donald Trump President-elect said during a press conference at Mar-a-Lago. On Monday, Dec. 1, September 16, 2024 in Palm Beach, Florida. (AP/Ivan Vucci)
Trump’s lawyers are suing under the Iowa Consumer Fraud Act. By accusing the defendant “Participate in “An unfair act or practice” due to the publication and dissemination of the Harris poll. This causes significant and avoidable injury to consumers. which is not outweighed by consumers or any competitors Benefits that arise from that practice”
They also said consumers were right. “Very deceptive and misleading about the true positions of the Iowa presidential candidates.”
“Moreover. President Trump Trump 2024 campaign and other Republicans forced to divert vast amounts of campaign and financial resources to Iowa based on the fraudulent Harris Poll,” the lawsuit states. It added that Des Moines registry consumers and Iowans contributed to Trump’s 2024 campaign “was similarly deceived.”
Trump is seeking actual damages during the trial. Statutory damages are three times the actual damages. Order for the defendant “Continued deceptive and misleading acts and practices in connection with Harris Poll and forced defendants to disclose all information on which they relied in order to engage in deceptive and misleading conduct in connection with Harris Poll; Attorney’s fees and related expenses cases and any other relief as the court deems appropriate
The lawsuit Monday night came just hours after the president-elect said during a news conference at Mar-a-Lago that he planned to sue the Des Moines registry and Seltzer.
The lawsuit comes just days after ABC News and top news anchor George Stephanopoulos Reached settlement with Trump in his defamation case. As a result, the network had to pay out $15 million to the president-elect.
The agreement was submitted to the public on Saturday. It reveals a deal to avoid a costly trial. As part of the agreement, ABC News will pay $15 million to charity. “Presidential foundations and museums to be established by or for plaintiffs. Just like the presidents of the United States established in the past.”
The network will also pay $1 million in Trump’s legal fees.
Stephanopoulos and ABC News were also required to issue a “regretful” statement, according to the editor’s note at the bottom of the March 10, 2024, issue. online articlesabout comments made earlier this year that led Trump to file a defamation lawsuit The message read: “ABC News and George Stephanopoulos. “Disappointed by statements made about President Donald J. Trump during an interview by George Stephanopoulos with Rep. Nancy Mace on ABC’s This Week on March 10, 2024.”

George Stephanopoulos Speaking during ABC’s “This Week” (ABC/Paula Lobo via Getty Images)
ABC News said the network was “delighted” to conclude the case.
“We are pleased that both sides have reached an agreement to dismiss the case in accordance with the terms of the court filing,” an ABC News spokesperson told Fox News Digital.
The lawsuit against the Des Moines Register and the ABC News settlement come after a series of legal victories for Trump and his legal team. with the cooperation of Senior Legal Adviser Boris Epshteyn.
Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan recently approved Special Counsel Jack Smith’s latest request to dismiss his lawsuit against Trump related to the 2020 election. Smith also filed an appeal in the secret records case on Monday. after a federal judge dismissed all charges in July. It was determined that he had been illegally appointed as special counsel.
In New York v. Trump, Justice Juan Murshan granted Trump’s request to dismiss charges stemming from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case and canceled the president’s sentencing date. that was selected from the schedule
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
On Monday night, Merchan rejected Trump’s request in July to overturn his guilty verdict based on presidential immunity. Merchan has not yet ruled on Trump’s official move to drop all charges.
Trump is also suing CBS News for $10 billion in damages. specifying that the network uses He described “deceptive behavior” intended to interfere in the election in an October interview with Vice President Kamala Harris.
[ad_2]
Source link